Redlining’s Lasting Impact: How Systemic Discrimination Continues to Suppress Youth Voter Participation
The end of redlining in 1968 should have marked the beginning of equitable opportunities for all American communities, yet the policy’s legacy persists. Redlining, which originated as a federal policy in the 1930s, systematically segregated neighborhoods by withholding loans and financial resources from predominantly Black, Latino and other minority neighborhoods, as well as low-income areas. Redlined communities were color-coded on maps, with banks denying loans to anyone within the “red” zones, effectively isolating these communities from wealth-building opportunities and upward mobility. The result has been enduring economic disparity that has affected nearly every aspect of life for people in redlined communities, from the schools they attend, to the healthcare readily available, to their access to the voting process.
Today, redlining’s lingering impact is especially visible in the political sphere. Young people in historically redlined neighborhoods face unique challenges to voter participation that stem directly from the socio-economic conditions left behind by decades of discriminatory practices. These practices, actively being pursued by people in power, should be brought to an end. Redlining’s legacy has evolved into a form of modern voter suppression for young people, as limited access to polling places, transportation and voter education keeps youth in these communities marginalized within the democratic process.
The Roots and Legacy of Redlining
Understanding redlining’s impact requires a look into its origins. In 1933, as part of the New Deal, the federal government established the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), which created maps to guide mortgage lending. Neighborhoods with predominantly Black or other minority populations were marked in red and labeled “hazardous.” This led to a widespread denial of loans, which prevented generations of families from gaining homeownership. Homeownership is a primary avenue for building wealth in the U.S., as homeowners gain nearly $30,000 per year in housing wealth. Over time, redlining created cycles of poverty and disadvantage in affected communities, as investment in housing, education and infrastructure dried up.
Despite the legal end of redlining with the Fair Housing Act of 1968, its effects remain deeply embedded in American cities. Redlined communities are still more likely to have underfunded schools, fewer employment opportunities and limited healthcare access, factors that all contribute to a lack of political engagement. According to recent studies, nearly 70% of formerly redlined communities continue to experience economic hardship and infrastructure deficits, perpetuating social inequality across generations. For young people in these areas, such disparities limit their resources, opportunities and political influence, beginning an endless cycle of disenfranchisement that discourages participation in the democratic process and allows politicians to ignore the needs of these communities.
How Redlining Influences Modern Voter Suppression
One significant effect of redlining’s legacy on political engagement is the lack of access to convenient and well-staffed polling places. Historically redlined areas have fewer polling locations, and those that exist often experience long wait times and staffing issues. For young people who may work part-time jobs, attend school, or lack reliable transportation, the logistics of voting become daunting, even when they want to participate. In 2024, research from the Brennan Center for Justice highlighted that a disproportionate number of polling closures occur in neighborhoods that were once redlined. The same study revealed that these closures often affect low-income and minority populations the most, significantly reducing voter turnout in these areas.
Public transportation limitations play a particularly crucial role. Since redlined areas were historically underfunded, many lack reliable transportation options that would make it easier for young people to reach polling places. As a result, even those who are motivated to vote may be unable to do so due to the inaccessibility of voting locations. For example, in Atlanta—a city heavily affected by redlining—polling closures and transit deficiencies mean that young voters in certain neighborhoods have to travel over an hour just to cast a ballot. The difficulty of access makes youth turnout in these areas notably lower than in well-funded, majority-white neighborhoods.
The Role of Voter ID Laws and Bureaucratic Hurdles
Another critical issue is the rise of strict voter ID laws. Many states require specific types of identification, which are sometimes costly or difficult for young people to obtain. Youth from low-income families may lack the necessary documentation, such as a driver’s license, especially if they rely on public transportation rather than personal vehicles. Furthermore, in states that recently enacted voter ID laws, turnout among minority youth fell sharply, exacerbating the impact of existing socio-economic challenges tied to redlining.
In formerly redlined neighborhoods, bureaucratic challenges make it particularly hard for young, first-time voters to navigate the process. Registration deadlines and false online information such as voting by text that are specifically targeted towards marginalized communities create barriers that disproportionately affect low-income and minority youth. According to research from the Urban Institute, more than half of youth from low-income communities report feeling “unprepared” for the voting process, indicating the need for targeted civic education efforts.
Youth Disengagement and Its Long-Term Consequences
When young people face barriers to voting, the effects are long-lasting. Disengagement from politics creates a generational disconnect where policies fail to address the needs of these communities due to a lack of representation. Without participation from youth and underrepresented people in local elections, for instance, issues like school funding, infrastructure development, and social services go unaddressed, leading to further marginalization. Over time, this erodes trust in government institutions, creating a feedback loop of apathy and disengagement.
Studies show that voting habits are established early in life. Youth who vote are more likely to become lifelong voters. However, when voting is made challenging, the likelihood of developing a voting habit decreases significantly, creating a cycle where future generations may also feel disconnected from the political process.
Breaking Down Barriers: Solutions and Advocacy Efforts
Addressing these barriers requires both immediate action and systemic reform. Expanding early voting options and establishing more polling sites in underserved communities would help to mitigate the impact of voter suppression tactics rooted in redlining. Additionally, efforts to expand automatic voter registration could simplify the process for young people in marginalized neighborhoods, ensuring they are included in the democratic process.
Education also plays a significant role. By investing in civics education, especially in underfunded schools in historically redlined neighborhoods, young people would gain the knowledge and confidence needed to participate in voting and understand its impact. Several organizations are working on this issue, including the nonprofit Fair Fight Action, which advocates for expanded voter access, and the Brennan Center for Justice, which fights voter suppression laws.
The Media’s Role in Promoting Awareness
The media also holds a powerful role in informing the public about the ongoing impacts of redlining. By educating young people about systemic barriers to voting and providing guidance on how to navigate them, media outlets would empower youth to engage in the democratic process. News platforms should consistently highlight the barriers faced by young voters in formerly redlined areas, offering clear, accessible information on voting rights, registration deadlines, and voter ID requirements.
Furthermore, by holding government officials accountable and drawing attention to the unequal distribution of polling resources, the media can advocate for reforms that make the electoral process more equitable.
Looking Forward: Building an Inclusive Democracy
Redlining may have ended on paper, but its effects remain deeply rooted in American society, with lasting impacts on the political involvement of young people in historically marginalized communities. Breaking down barriers and promoting voting access is essential to building a more inclusive democracy—one where every young person, regardless of neighborhood or background, has an equal opportunity to shape the future.
Ensuring that young people from these areas are enfranchised and engaged will require sustained advocacy, policy changes, and a concerted effort from the media, educators, and community organizations. With targeted support, it is possible to dismantle the cycle of disenfranchisement that has long silenced these communities, empowering the next generation to participate fully in the democratic process.
The image featured in this article is licensed for use under the CC0 1.0 Universal license. No changes were made to the original image, which can be found here.